REPORT ON WASTE AND RECYCLING AT LAKESIDE COLLEGE1
To: The Sustainability Committee
From: The Environmental Monitoring Group
Date: 15 August 2026
Subject: An assessment of current waste practices and proposals for reform2
Introduction3
This report examines how waste is produced and managed at Lakeside College and evaluates the effectiveness of the recycling scheme introduced two years ago. Its scope is limited to the main teaching buildings and the canteen. The findings are based on a waste audit conducted over a two-week period, interviews with cleaning staff, and a questionnaire distributed to 200 students and teachers. The purpose is both to establish the scale of the problem and to propose realistic reforms that could be introduced without significant expense.
General findings
The audit indicated that the volume of waste produced has remained largely unchanged since the scheme began, despite the installation of recycling bins throughout the site. In total, an estimated 1.2 tonnes of waste were sent to landfill during the audit period, a figure broadly in line with the year before the scheme was launched.4 Approximately 40% of the material placed in general-waste bins could, in fact, have been recycled. This suggests that the mere presence of bins has done little, on its own, to change everyday behaviour.
Contamination of recycling5
A particular problem was identified in the recycling stream itself. It was found that a significant proportion of recycling bins contained food waste and non-recyclable packaging, which meant that entire bags were often rejected at the sorting stage.6 In one building, more than half of the sampled bins were affected. Staff reported that unclear labelling was the most common cause of this confusion.
Awareness and attitudes
The questionnaire revealed a more encouraging picture. While practical behaviour remained inconsistent, a clear majority of respondents expressed support for stronger environmental measures and stated that they would participate more fully if guidance were clearer. Notably, younger students expressed the strongest willingness to change, suggesting that any campaign would find a receptive audience. A number of respondents also volunteered practical suggestions of their own, ranging from clearer signage to regular reminders during tutor time.
Recommendations7
On the basis of these findings, the following measures are recommended:
• clear, colour-coded labels should be fixed to every bin;
• a short awareness campaign should be run at the start of each term;
• food waste should be collected separately in the canteen;
• progress should be reviewed and reported once a year.
Conclusion8
The evidence suggests that the existing scheme has not yet achieved its aims, largely because of confusion rather than indifference. With clearer guidance and modest practical changes, the college is well placed to reduce its waste substantially in the coming year.
1Büyük harfli başlık
Konuyu net veren, biçimi tanıtan başlık. Title in capitals.
2Üst blok
To / From / Date / Subject — raporun kimliği. Header block.
3Introduction
Amaç, kapsam ve yöntem birlikte verilir. Purpose, scope and method.
4Nicel veri
Tonaj ve yüzde ile ölçülebilir kanıt. Quantitative data.
5Alt başlıklı bölümleme
Bulgular temalı alt başlıklara ayrılır; HL'de beklenir. Sub-headed sections.
6Nesnel 3. şahıs + edilgen
"It was found that…" — kişiselleştirmeden aktarım. Objective third person, passive.
7Maddelenmiş öneriler
Bulgulardan çıkan, uygulanabilir tavsiyeler. Itemised recommendations.
8İleriye dönük sonuç
Nedeni yorumlar, geleceğe bakan kapanış. Forward-looking conclusion.